Lawrence Gee | Marketing, Internet, Creativity, Strategy

This Blog Post Will Live In The Internet Forever

Society is in a transition stage when it comes to information.  Technology has enhanced not only the speed in which people access information but also the breadth of it.  This leads to less anonymity and cases like one that I came across about a Ryerson University freshman who is fighting 147 charges of academic misconduct because he was helping run a chemistry study group on Facebook. I’m not saying that the student wasn’t in the wrong here but he shouldn’t be at risk for expulsion either.  Comparing answers, discussing problems, and helping other students out is a part of academia and whether it was done in person or online shouldn’t matter.  In the end, it’s student education and the learning process that should be the focal point here.   

As part of the learning process, everyone, especially younger generations, needs to understand that anything that is posted on the web is probably able to be found with enough searching.  Again, it goes back to the breadth of information and speed to which you can access it.  There are many tools like Wink.com which can search social networks, blogs, websites, and more and give you back results based on search criteria such as last name, location, school, interests, etc. 

Students are not the only ones who are naive about the drunken photos they post on their social networks.  Last July, Whole Foods CEO John Mackey was discovered to have anonymously posted negative forum posts against his company’s competitor, Wild Oats Markets from 1999 to 2006. With so much data being stored and tracked, you can find out almost anything these days. 

Society needs to be more sensitive to these issues and should be conscious about what they do online.  I understand that my blog, my social networking profiles, pictures that I and other people post, etc. are all potentially accessible by anyone.  But, I’m also quite vigilant in monitoring what is out there and accessing the risk when I put content out there myself.

That being said, I’m sure that I’m in the minority of those who strongly considers how they interact with the Internet.  There are new rules of conduct that are taking shape in this digital world today and it’ll take time for the adjustments to take place.  I believe that society should be more forgiving towards conflicts that arise and issues like the one at Ryerson University. 

No Comments » | Bookmark Me:

A Look at Facebook Apps

I’m on Facebook much like many of my peers and former colleagues.  It offers all the benefits of a social network - the ability to post pictures, comment on each other’s profiles, and see who knows who.  It attracts plenty of traffic due to the interactive nature of the content.  As a marketer, I am instantly interested in it due to its captive audience, high level of interaction, frequency of user visits, and ability to potentially target specific segments. 

One element I don’t truly understand is if Facebook Applications or Widgets really hold any value for marketers.  For Fortune 500 companies, I see some obvious benefits including branding, increased touch points, and creating deeper interaction with consumers.  However, the challenge is creating applications that fit with your brand and are interesting enough for people to want to add the application.  A good example of this is TripAdvisor’s “Cities I’ve Visited” Application.  It fits well with the branding of TripAdvisor.com (that being offering travel advice, reviews, and forums) and it is interesting enough that people would add the application (always interesting to see where people have traveled to).  However the application has a bit under 54,000 daily active users as of today, which is only 1% of the Facebook population.

Most popular applications are not done by Fortune 500 companies but rather by small start-ups or individuals.  Some popular ones include SuperWall, Flixster, Slide, Scrabulous to name a few.  I can see a couple of potential revenue streams that many are utilizing today - online advertising (banner and text ads) and affiliate referral commissions.  I’ve also seen merchandise being sold based off application characters like (Fluff)Friends and can see the potential for using an application as a lead generation tool to other games/programs/services a developer might sell outside of Facebook. 

In my opinion, the problem with these applications are the stickiness and loyalty of its user base.  I feel that popular applications one month quickly fizzle out to the next application the next month.  It’s almost like what’s the current flavor of the month?  Amongst my friends alone, I’ve seen mass interest jump from Scrabulous to (Fluff )Friends to Who Has The Biggest Brain? over the past 2-3 months alone.  Looking at applications from the business side, I question how much money should be invested in creating these applications.  There’s definitely alot of buzz surrounding applications and widgets but I’m not totally convinced that the buzz is actionable.

No Comments » | Bookmark Me:

And Then There Were Two? A Look at The Microyahoosoft

No, it will never really be called Microyahoosoft or Microsofthoo or even Yahoosoft but the proposed $44.6 billion bid by Microsoft for Yahoo! was definitely really big news last Friday.  It takes two huge Internet players and creates a beast of a company that just might have a chance at slowing down the Google machine.  So what’s the potential impact of such a merger?  Let’s take a look at some of the obvious and not so obvious synergies:

Search and Advertising Platforms

The most obvious outcome of the proposed merger would be to combine the #2 and #3 players in the U.S. Search Market.  According to a CNN article, Google holds approximately 58.4% of the U.S. search market, while Yahoo has 22.9% and Microsoft’s share is just 9.8%.  In terms of online display ads, combined Microsoft and Yahoo! would control around a 25% share.  This is big business especially since it’s projected that online advertising could reach $60 billion by 2010.  Both Microsoft and Yahoo! have been struggling to keep up with Google.  Both companies search marketing tools are inferior to Google’s on a variety of dimensions.  Combining forces could help both companies share existing research, development, and other resources. 

E-Mail and IM 

A Microsoft-Yahoo! marriage would combine to create a force in E-Mail and Instant Messaging.  Adding a strong Microsoft Hotmail to #1 Yahoo! Mail only creates an even more dominant player.  Combing both MSN Messenger and Yahoo! Messenger would allow more users to connect to one another.

Social Media

E-Mail and Instant Messaging creates instant networks that Microsoft-Yahoo! could tap into to use use to their advantage in the larger social network context. Also, a Microsoft-Yahoo! would have a much richer portfolio of web properties.  Combined you would have an interest in Facebook (which Microsoft has invested heavily in) and Yahoo! owned del.icio.us and Flickr.  Couldn’t you imagine a larger social network being developed that gets integrated with these web properties and overlayed by these e-mail and instant messaging networks? 

Mac vs. PC ads 

Yes,PC isn’t as cool as Mac.  But perhaps the proposed merger could give PC a flashy purple suit just as a shot of Yahoo! culture might be beneficial to Microsoft. 

All in all, just some food for thought.  We still have a bit of time to consider more effects of the proposed merger — if it does move forward, it probably won’t be finalized until the end of 2008.

No Comments » | Bookmark Me:

Going Ga-Ga over Maka-Maka

Wow, on the same concept as the previous post, Is Facebook the Next Revolution of E-Mail, I came across this article about Google’s latest initiative called “Maka-Maka”.  Maka-Maka is a social network/matrix overlay over Google’s popular applications like Gmail and Google Maps.  Like Facebook, it looks like Google wants to incorporate more interactivity and interaction amongst the user and their network of friends.  I could instantly imagine recommendations of restaurants by friends on Google Maps, looking at personal profiles through your contact list on Gmail, or giving a status update to your network if you are editing a document on Google Docs. 

This will be quite interesting to see how Google develops “Maka-Maka” but the initial premise seems quite promising — making the web an even smaller and more interactive arena where better conversations can occur.

No Comments » | Bookmark Me:

Is Facebook the Next Evolution of E-mail?

 From the daily (often hourly) ritual of checking Facebook for updates on the lives of my friends I began to wonder, could Facebook be the next evolution of personal e-mail?  What is E-Mail?  Well, Wikipedia defines it as ”a store and forward method of composing, sending, storing, and receiving messages over electronic communication systems.”  On the personal side, many people send emails to share news, forward interesting articles, discuss topics, and/or communicate to multiple people at once.

On Facebook, one can definitely compose, send, store, and receive messages (via private message or on someone’s wall).  One can share news (through status updates) and forward interesting articles (group postings).  Topics can be debated via wall posts and status updates can be equivalent to a message to multiple friends. 

The difference for Facebook is interactivity, speed, and personality.  Yes emails are informative, but on Facebook wall posts back and forth are conversations.  Yes I can spend the time to email all my friends to what’s new in my life, but in Facebook I can merely change the status in my profile and instantly let all my friends know what I’m up to or feeling.  While e-mail is merely an address, Facebook provides profiles where I can put a face and personal information (via what they put in their profiles, show in their photos, etc.) to the messages they send.  These aspects seem quite powerful.  Could we be saying in the future, “I’ll Facebook it to you?” instead of “I’ll e-mail it to you?”

1 Comment » | Bookmark Me: